These summaries were prepared by McGuireWoods LLP lawyer Thomas E. Spahn. They are based on the letter opinions issued by the Virginia State Bar. Any editorial comments reflect Mr. Spahn's current personal views, and not the opinions of the Virginia State Bar, McGuireWoods or its clients. 
 
 Back to main menu
  Topic: 34 - Limiting Liability to Clients
LEO NumTopicsSummaryDate
1817

printPrint
16-Lawyer's Personal Interests

34-Limiting Liability to Clients

36-Withdrawal from Representations

48-Criminal Defense Lawyers

A criminal defense lawyer who has failed to properly perfect an appeal must (under the duty to communicate material facts) "notify the client of the dismissal of the appeal, the reasons for the dismissal and what rights or recourse the client has under those circumstances" (which "would include advising the client of the right to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of counsel; or a claim for legal malpractice based upon the lawyer's act or omission"). Although this situation obviously involves the lawyer's own interests (which might otherwise prevent the lawyer from proceeding on the client's behalf), new legislation requires the lawyer to assist the client in preparing and filing an affidavit explaining the lawyer's error. To the extent that this new statute requires a continuing representation (thus trumping the ethics rules), it overrules the holdings of Virginia LEO 1122 and 1558.8/17/2005
0966

printPrint
16-Lawyer's Personal Interests

34-Limiting Liability to Clients

39-Miscellaneous

58-Real Estate Lawyers

A law firm hired to advise on a real estate matter must disclose to the client that the law firm mistakenly failed to obtain an extension of time to file a tax return, even though the law firm was not hired to file the return. 9/30/1987
1550

printPrint
16-Lawyer's Personal Interests

34-Limiting Liability to Clients

A lawyer may not prospectively limit liability to a client, but may secure a release from the client for "specific completed acts" in exchange for consideration if the client consents after full disclosure, is "first advised to seek independent counsel as to whether to sign such an agreement" and if the transaction was not "unconscionable, unfair or inequitable when made."The Bar reaffirmed the ethical propriety of arbitration provisions in retainer agreements covering any malpractice claims as long as the client consents after full disclosure and "is advised to seek independent counsel in regard to the advisability of such a provision." 10/20/1993
1487

printPrint
32-Lawyers Acting in Other Roles (Miscellaneous)

34-Limiting Liability to Clients

76-Trust and Estate Lawyers

A lawyer representing the executor of an estate sought a general release from the widow. The Bar needed more facts before determining whether an attorney-client relationship existed between the lawyer and the widow. If it did, a general release would be per se improper. Because the lawyer was acting as a fiduciary even if not as a lawyer, "such a general release is not a good practice and does not follow the spirit of the Disciplinary Rule." 11/16/1992
0638

printPrint
34-Limiting Liability to Clients

A retainer agreement may contain an arbitration provision covering malpractice claims as long as the client is fully informed of the provision's effect and is advised to seek independent legal advice. 12/3/1984
1586

printPrint
34-Limiting Liability to Clients

A retainer letter requiring arbitration of fee disputes does not amount to a per se violation of the Code as long as: there is "full and adequate disclosure as to all possible consequences" of the agreement; the client consents; and the arrangement is not "unconscionable, unfair, or inequitable when made." 4/11/1994
1412

printPrint
34-Limiting Liability to Clients

49-Lawyers - Miscellaneous

A solo practitioner's research and preparation of briefs and other pleadings constitutes the practice of law, which prevents the lawyer from limiting the lawyer's professional liability (regardless of the lawyer's attempt to contractually define the services as not amounting to legal services). 6/12/1991
1707

printPrint
22-Interviews with Prospective Clients

34-Limiting Liability to Clients

Although a "lawyer's fiduciary duties extend to preliminary consultation by a prospective client with a view to engagement," it is not per se improper for a client engagement agreement to provide for binding arbitration of legal malpractice claims as long as there is adequate disclosure and consent. Like fee agreements, such initially-acceptable engagement agreement provisions might become improper given the "occurrence of unusual and extraordinary facts and circumstances not contemplated at the outset of the representation." The Bar declines to require any specific disclosures or insist that the client actually consult another lawyer before entering into such an agreement (in LEO 638, the Bar seemed to require that the client must be advised to seek independent counsel regarding an arbitration provision). Appropriate disclosures might include "waiver of trial by jury or by the court, discovery, evidentiary rules, arbitrator selection, scope of award, expense, appellate rights, finality of award, enforcement of award." 1/12/1998
0877

printPrint
34-Limiting Liability to Clients

54-Insurance Defense Lawyers

57-In-House Lawyers

71-Representing Corporations

An in-house lawyer may not obtain an indemnification agreement. [Rule 1.8(h) permits such indemnity agreements if the corporation is separately represented.]4/1/1987
1364

printPrint
34-Limiting Liability to Clients

57-In-House Lawyers

71-Representing Corporations

Corporate counsel may not accept an indemnity commitment from their employer. [Rule 1.8(h) now permits such indemnity agreements if the corporation is separately represented.]6/28/1990
0195

printPrint
34-Limiting Liability to Clients

If clients request it, lawyers may purchase at their own expense a fidelity bond covering their activities. 7/30/1968
1211

printPrint
15-Representing Other Entities - Miscellaneous

34-Limiting Liability to Clients

57-In-House Lawyers

In-house lawyers do have attorney-client relationship with employer, and therefore may not ask for an indemnity agreement. [This LEO was overruled by Rule 1.8(h), which permits such indemnity agreements if the corporation is separately represented.]4/19/1989
ABA-425

printPrint
8-Bills and Fees

34-Limiting Liability to Clients

Lawyers and clients may agree to arbitrate fee and malpractice disputes, but: the client would have to be independently represented if the agreement limits the lawyer's possible liability (for instance, by precluding punitive damages that would be available in a lawsuit); the lawyer must explain "the possible adverse consequences as well as the benefits" of such an arrangement, such as the client's waiver of jury trial, broad discovery and appellate rights, the details of arbitration process and the possibility that the client may have to pay fees and costs of arbitration. 2/20/2002
ABA-401

printPrint
34-Limiting Liability to Clients

45-Law Firms - Miscellaneous

Lawyers may practice in limited liability partnerships if they meet legal requirements, accurately describe the entity in communication and assure that "the lawyer rendering the legal services to the client must be personally responsible to the client." 8/2/1996

Copyright 2000, Thomas E. Spahn