1058
|
| LEO 1046 determines whether a full-time Commonwealth's Attorney may prosecute an embezzlement that involves a store owned by an employee of the law firm where the Commonwealth's Attorney formerly practiced. [Under LEO 1046, the prosecution would be proper if the lawyer could rebut the presumption that the lawyer had acquired confidential information from the law firm employee.] [Rule 1.11(d) would allow this representation if the lawyer were never "personally and substantially" involved in the matter while in private practice.] |