These summaries were prepared by McGuireWoods LLP lawyer Thomas E. Spahn. They are based on the letter opinions issued by the Virginia State Bar. Any editorial comments reflect Mr. Spahn's current personal views, and not the opinions of the Virginia State Bar, McGuireWoods or its clients. 
 
 Back to main menu

  Print This Leo
LEO NumTopicsSummary
ABA-520

print
14-Ownership of Files and Attorney Lien Issues

36-Withdrawal from Representations

(Under Rule 1.16 (d), lawyers have a “limited duty” in “limited situations” to provide former clients or their lawyers “certain information that is not already memorialized in the client’s file;“ ABA LEO 471 (2015) addressed the duty’s application to documents, and confirmed that the duty did not apply to material information or the lawyer’s errors discovered after the representation ended; as for information “not memorialized in the materials,” lawyers must disclose such unrecorded information if: (1) it is “necessary to protect the former client’s interests in the matter” and (2) it is “reasonably practicable to do so, “unless the information: (1) “is readily accessible elsewhere, or by other means;” (2) “concern[s] a different matter,” such as litigation following “a completed business transaction“ about which the former client seeks useful information; (3) involves the generation of “further work product;” (4) would require the lawyer to retrieve information not in the lawyer’s possession or otherwise known; (5) would obligate the lawyer “to perform further work, such as reviewing a court file, to refresh the lawyer’s recollection,” or “tak[ing] steps to acquire information, research and generate written responses;” (6) involves former clients’ “repetitive or excessively time – consuming requests;” or (7) would require the lawyer to “perform[ ] further legal services;” lawyers receiving requests from successor counsel must confirm the former client’s consent to the disclosure)

Copyright 2000, Thomas E. Spahn