These summaries were prepared by McGuireWoods LLP lawyer Thomas E. Spahn. They are based on the letter opinions issued by the Virginia State Bar. Any editorial comments reflect Mr. Spahn's current personal views, and not the opinions of the Virginia State Bar, McGuireWoods or its clients. 
 
 Back to main menu

  Print This Leo
LEO NumTopicsSummary
ABA-518

print
68-Lawyers Acting as Mediators

ABA Model Rule 2.4 governs lawyers’ duties when acting as mediators, which such lawyers must clearly explain to the parties. As a neutral, such lawyers “should not state that the lawyer-mediator is acting to achieve a party’s best interest or that a proposed settlement is in a party’s best interest.” They may “provide legal information” and “offer an opinion as to how a tribunal is likely a rule on an issue,” but “should not state or imply that a settlement is in the party’s best interest because a tribunal is likely to decide adversely to the party.” As explained an ABA LEO 439 (4/12/06), under ABA Model Rule 4.1, “untrue statements [by lawyers representing negotiation parties] are not entirely forbidden.” But lawyer-mediators do “not have the same leeway.” For instance, they may not make a knowingly false statement that “this is the best offer the opposing party will make“ or “make misleading statements about the strength or weakness of a party’s case.” Similarly, lawyer-mediators may “accurately convey“ statements from a party’s lawyer permissible for those lawyers under ABA Model Rule 4.1 (because they “are not regarded as false statements of “‘material fact’“) – but such lawyer-mediators “may not give credence to those statements if the mediator knows them to be false”

Copyright 2000, Thomas E. Spahn