These summaries were prepared by McGuireWoods LLP lawyer Thomas E. Spahn. They are based on the letter opinions issued by the Virginia State Bar. Any editorial comments reflect Mr. Spahn's current personal views, and not the opinions of the Virginia State Bar, McGuireWoods or its clients. 
 
 Back to main menu
  Topic: 11 - "Of Counsel" Relationship
LEO NumTopicsSummaryDate
1467

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

A law firm may act as "of counsel" to another law firm if there is "a requisite close, regular, personal relationship" between the firms. 6/23/1992
1735

printPrint
8-Bills and Fees

11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

38-Fee Splitting

42-Payments to Solicit Recommendations

45-Law Firms - Miscellaneous

A law firm may employ independent contractor lawyers under the following conditions: whether acting as independent contractors, contract attorneys or "of counsel," the lawyers must be treated as part of the law firm for confidentiality and conflicts of interest purposes; the firm must advise clients of any "mark-up" between the amount billed for the independent contractor lawyers' services and the amount paid to them if "the firm bills the amount paid to the Attorney as an out-of-pocket expense or disbursement," but need not make such disclosure to the clients if the firm bills for the lawyers' work "in the same manner as it would for any other associate in the Firm" and the independent contractor lawyer works under another lawyer's "direct supervision" or the firm "adopts the work product as its own;" the independent contractor lawyers may be designated as "of counsel" to the firm if they have a "close, continuing relationship with the Firm and direct contact with the firm and its clients" and avoid holding themselves out as being partners or associates of the firm; the firm must disclose to clients that an independent contractor lawyer is working on the client's matter if the lawyers "will work independently, without close supervision by an attorney associated with the Firm," but need not make such disclosure (and obtain consent)if the "temporary or contract attorney works directly under the supervision of an attorney in the Firm;" the firm may pay a "forwarding" or "referral" fee to the independent contractor lawyers for bringing in a client under the new Rules.10/20/1999
1342

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

41-Non-Virginia Lawyers

A lawyer may include a non-Virginia lawyer as "of counsel" on the firm's letterhead, but the characterization must be accurate. Providing business advice and financial assistance to the firm does not create an "of counsel" relationship. 4/20/1990
ABA-357

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

A lawyer or a law firm may be "of counsel" to another law firm as long as there is a close, regular, personal relationship with the firm. 5/10/1990
0389

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

A lawyer who is "of counsel" to a firm must be alert to the "enhanced conflict of interest potential inherent in the arrangement." 8/23/1980
1759

printPrint
7-Family Conflicts

11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

18-Consent and Prospective Waivers

50-Lawyer-Owned Businesses

68-Lawyers Acting as Mediators

73-Family Law Lawyers

A lawyer who owns a mediation company is "of counsel" to a law firm in which his/her spouse is a partner. After mediation of a domestic dispute, one of the parties asks an associate in the law firm to file for divorce on behalf of that party. The Bar holds that lawyers/mediators may not represent either party after they handle a mediation, even with the clients' consent (overruling earlier LEOs 1684, 590, 544 and 511). Because this specific disqualification applies only to the lawyer/mediator, an associate in the firm would not be disqualified based on the mediator's disqualification. However, the lawyer/mediator's duty of confidentiality arising from the mediation also disqualifies that lawyer, and is imputed to the firm to which the lawyer/mediator is "of counsel" (although client consent can cure this conflict). If there were no connection between the lawyer/mediator and the law firm, lawyers practicing in the firm would not be disqualified from representing the party in the divorce as a result of the spousal relationship to the mediator. [Rule 1.10 now imputes the individual's disqualification to the entire law firm, as explained in Virginia LEO 1826.]2/4/2002
0442

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

A lawyer who works part-time for a law firm may be listed as "of counsel." 12/7/1981
1554

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

55-Firm Names and Letterhead

A retired lawyer may be listed as "of counsel" to a firm even though the retired lawyer is not actively practicing law, as long as the lawyer "remains associated with the firm and available for occasional consultations." The designation would be improper if the retired lawyer's association "was limited to a pure business affiliation" or to "either the development of business or the management of the firm's business activities." The Bar quoted earlier LEOs as indicating that the "of counsel" relationship "turns on the actual practice of law and is not satisfied by a mere business or financial relationship with the firm, a sporadic affiliation over time, or the status of a forwarder or receiver of legal business." 10/22/1993
1866

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

A solo practitioner may become "of counsel" to a law firm, which requires "a close, continuing, and personal relationship between a lawyer and a firm that is not the relationship of a partner, associate, or outside consultant." The "of counsel" relationship must "involve some element of the practice of law" -- rather than a "pure business affiliation" or the mere forwarding of business. Lawyers entering into such a relationship with a law firm, or incorrectly holding themselves out as having such a relationship, will be treated as "associated" with the law firm for imputation of conflicts purposes. Such lawyers and law firms cannot avoid such imputation by imposing ethics screens or using a term other than "of counsel" ("if the lawyer holds himself out to potential clients as being closely associated with the firm, or if he in fact is closely and regularly associated with the firm"). Imputation of conflicts does not result from a lawyer's role as an independent contractor. For instance, a lawyer will not be deemed "associated" with the firm for imputation or conflicts purposes "if the lawyer's access to information is restricted solely to those matters on which he or she is working on a temporary or occasional basis."7/26/2012
1282

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

A Virginia lawyer may be "of counsel" to Florida firm on trademark matters if the lawyer is "an integral part of the law firm's operation in the practice of law," but the lawyer's office may not be called the law firm's office because it suggests that the lawyer is a partner in the firm (citing ABA Formal Opinion 330). 9/21/1989
1353

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

57-In-House Lawyers

71-Representing Corporations

An in-house lawyer may also be "of counsel" to a law firm. However, there must be full disclosure and consent of the corporation for the law firm to do any of the corporation's legal work (even if the "of counsel" lawyer will not share in any of the fees). Moreover, outside counsel should communicate with a company lawyer other than the in-house lawyer who is also "of counsel" to the firm. 6/13/1990
ABA-388

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

13-Marketing - Miscellaneous

45-Law Firms - Miscellaneous

Describing relationships between law firms using terms like "network", "alliance", "correspondent", "affiliate" or "associate", without more, tends to mislead. If such a relationship would be relevant to a prospective client, the lawyer could include such a description in a retainer letter with such a client. Clients must be advised of relationships among firms (such as "of counsel" relationships) that might create a conflict of interests. 12/5/1994
1813

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

13-Marketing - Miscellaneous

Law firms may use the term "affiliated" or "associated" in describing their relationship, as long as one firm is "closely associated or connected with the other lawyer or firm in an ongoing and regular relationship." The terms are analogous to the "of counsel" relationship, which "must be close and regular, continuing and semi-permanent, and not merely that of a forwarder-receiver of legal business." It may be necessary for the law firms to use "more descriptive language" if the relationship between them involves one firm's limited availability to handle certain types of matters, or availability to handle matters in another state. Law firms using these terms must also ordinarily handle conflict as if they were one single firm.3/16/2005
1278

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

20-Government Official Conflicts

No lawyer in a firm (even those who are "of counsel" to the firm) may lobby before the General Assembly or other legislative body when another lawyer in the firm is an elected member of that body. 9/21/1989
1034

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

19-Judge Conflicts

20-Government Official Conflicts

55-Firm Names and Letterhead

The Canons of Judicial Conduct govern the permissibility of a lawyer appearing before a judge who was formerly a partner in the law firm (reaffirming LEO 552). It is improper to list a Congressman (who is precluded from the practice of law) as "of counsel" to a law firm. 2/9/1988
1293

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

To be "of counsel" to a firm, a lawyer must have a "continuing close association" with the firm. A lawyer may have such a relationship with more than one firm, but both firms must be careful to avoid confidentiality problems or conflicts of interests. 10/19/1989
0945

printPrint
11-"Of Counsel" Relationship

38-Fee Splitting

45-Law Firms - Miscellaneous

Two firms may not characterize themselves as "of counsel" to each other when the firms in essence have created only a referral relationship. Among other things, the firms may not agree to a 10% "referral fee" between themselves. [Rule 1.5(e) does not require that a lawyer sharing in fees also share responsibility, thus allowing "referral fees" if the client consents after full disclosure.] 6/10/1987

Copyright 2000, Thomas E. Spahn